Sunday, February 19, 2017

Alternative Theories: What’s Really Going On?

 
Chaos Rules - But Why?
The following is the blog post to accompany our February radio show, “Schmidt Happens,” which was recorded 15 February 2017, and aired Saturday night 18 Feb 2017 on WBCA-LP 102.9 FM Boston, hosted by Jumana Hashim and Rosemary Schmidt.
 
Audio Link via SoundCloud:


Preface:  When Jumana and I started planning our February show, what struck us was just how much has transpired since our first show, and even within the first four weeks of the new administration. Realize that when we taped the December show, we were still reacting to the election results, and asking the question: How did this happen? Now, we find ourselves reacting to the new presidency, and everything that has gone down since the inauguration, and asking a new question: What’s really going on? What is behind all of this manic, frantic, chaotic activity? We speak and write purely on topics of public concern; never seditious; but of primacy, out of concern for the health and very future of our Democracy.
 
We are not necessarily the first to put forth some of these thoughts; there are many voices, but we have at least brought many of these sources together for the reader.
 
Read on!


The opening chords for this show were from the Buffalo Springfield song, “For What It’s Worth (Stop Children What’s That Sound),” or at least my ‘transformative interpretation’ of it. I was happy to welcome Jumana back from her travels, and again send out a big thank-you to Ellen for helping out on the January show. So much has happened, since then, even, the stark contrast between the somberness of the inauguration that Friday, January 20, 2017, followed by the Women’s March the next day, with all the songs, and signs, and pithy sayings, and yes, pink kitty hats. Then, on Monday’s Morning Joe show on MSNBC, they played the alternating footage from the two events, with the 1966 song by Buffalo Springfield playing in the background. At the time, this is the verse that stuck with me, as it captured the feeling perfectly:

“A thousand people in the street
Singing songs and carrying signs.”
 
You can find the video on Joe Scarborough’s twitter feed on 23 January 2017, or view an unofficial version on YouTube:

It turns out we had both gone to the rally and march in Boston, but somehow didn’t manage to run into each other, maybe because of the other 175,000 people who were also there! What an amazing day! The sun even came out by the end of the day. And then there were all those pink hats, which in my mind linked up with one of the last things I’d said on the January pre-Inauguration show, that everything felt just so tenuous, like it could all come undone, with the pull of a thread. That Monday, the Executive Orders started rolling out and the unraveling began.

Jumana shared some of her observations, based on her personal experience, of all that had transpired so far in the first four short weeks of his presidency. Certainly, there were the Executive Orders, the Cabinet picks, the travel ban and how that was so poorly implemented, with no clear nexus between the countries on the list and national security. It makes it hard to predict what President Trump will do next; plus we may be hearing only a third of what’s really happening. In conversation with her peers, the question people keep asking is: What is his bigger goal? What is he trying to do? What’s really going on?
 
I said I had probably at least five different answers, possibly more.
 
1.  Maybe he is just doing what he said he was going to do, and is delivering on his campaign promises, fast and furious, to please his constituents.
 
2.  Maybe President Trump is being genuine, and is genuinely doing what he believes is best.
 
But, maybe there is something else going on, something behind the scenes, something more creative. It’s pretty easy to start down the road of conspiracy theories. Let’s explore some of these Alternate Theories.
 
3.  What if it the writers for “Saturday Night Live” are behind it all, to boost their ratings. Maybe they even rigged the election in Trump’s favor to ensure having years of material.
 
All kidding aside, though, what if there is something else going on?
 
4.  What if we are all just falling into a trap, the trap of endless marches, constant distraction, and exhaustion? Jumana noted that she has personally been questioning her own efforts. She has been going to the marches and gatherings, which all feel really good, seeing the strength in numbers, yes the unity and community, but then what next? She fears that the rallies and marches can also be falsely cathartic. We feel like we’re doing our part, but is it enough, or is it even anything at all? What are the tangible effects? Can we harness this energy and translate it into actual outcomes, such as Senate seats. Or are people going to get exhausted and overwhelmed? There have been multiple articles expressing this precise concern, that as we react to each day’s newest Executive Order, and ensuing outrage, and sign up for the rallies and protests and marches, are we being played? Is the frenetic pace and pandemonium emanating from the White House intended to distract and overwhelm us and wear us down?
 
We aren’t the first to put this theory on the table. Yvonne Abraham’s column in The Boston Globe on February 5, 2017, talked about a FaceBook post by Boston College history professor, Heather Cox Richardson, postulating that all the disruption has been a “deliberate attempt to throw us off balance and deepen divides between us…” which “makes the country more hospitable for a strongman” to take power.
 

5.  What if it’s all a massive test, to test public reaction, and the loyalties and compliance of agencies and individuals in the Government? You can do surveys and polls all day long, but if you really want to find out what they care about, do something, and see how they respond. For example:

·         Federal hiring freeze – No marches.
·         Gag order on EPA and some other federal agencies – Meh.
·         Travel ban – Ding! That got people in the streets.

The entire execution of the travel ban was so haphazard and poorly coordinated, surprisingly uncharacteristic of Mr. Trump. He’s a person known for razor-sharp business execution. So, you start to wonder whether the poor execution reflects simple incompetence; poorly done, due to poor planning.
 
But, what if it was poorly done on purpose? Poorly done, done well? What if this is also part of the test of the system, such as probing the strength of judiciary powers, and who will be compliant and who will rebel against his orders?
 
The very first article we had read when we started preparing for this show was one by Jake Fuentes, in which he asks the question: What if the entire travel ban fiasco was just a giant “headfake” intended to test the system of checks and balances within the Government? This was probably one of the most insightful articles I have read in trying to make sense of things lately.
 
 
What’s horrible, of course, is that this would mean that we really can’t take anything at face value anymore. It feels like we have to constantly question everything. There could be ulterior motives, alternate explanations, and truly something else going on.
 
When I first heard the Buffalo Springfield song again, after so many years, I’d focused on the lines about the crowds, and songs, and signs, but now I am drawn to the last verse:
 
“Paranoia strikes deep
Into your life it will creep”
 
It feels like we have to question everything. Nothing feels safe. These are not normal times. Such chaos. (Ironically, this show was taped the night before the Press Conference Thursday February 16, 2017, which put this chaos on full display.) Not boring, true, but what could be the purpose of all this chaos?
 
What if we look at the new Presidency through the lens of a businessman? Maybe what’s happening is essentially like a business takeover; perhaps a hostile takeover. Think about what happens typically. The new company imposes its culture, values, and beliefs, and replaces key positions with their people. For example, in the midst of all the confusion and turmoil surrounding the travel ban, President Trump quietly slipped Steve Bannon onto the National Security Council. I remember seeing a tweet from one of the travel ban protests at LAX airport, and a guy was holding a sign that read:
 
“Don’t Think We Don’t See This Shit You’re Pulling With The National Security Council”
 
This brings us to The Daily Beast article by Ronald Radosh, that talks about Steve Bannon’s motives. Ellen was the one who showed it to me.
 
 
This article came out all the way back in August; at a time when a Trump presidency was still completely inconceivable to most people. In this article, Steve Bannon tells the author that he is a Leninist, and his goal would be to tear down, destroy, and deconstruct the current establishment. If that was truly someone’s end goal, then a very good first step would be to test the system, perform a stress test, to identify its weaknesses and vulnerabilities.
 
This last Alternative Theory might well be the most plausible. We would like to be wrong, and would like to hope that higher motives will prevail, but for now, this seems to be the best explanation so far.
 
Stay tuned. Stay woke!
 
 
Post-Script
Today’s Boston Globe offered yet another angle on what’s happening behind the scenes at the White House, essentially the tactic of developing a set of rival teams. Worth a read!
 
 
Today 19 February 2017:
·         Science Rally at Copley Square, Boston
·         Today, I Am A Muslim Too Rally at Times Square, New York City
·         Special screening of the movie, Allegiance, commemorating the 75-year anniversary of the signing of the Executive Order by President Franklin Delano Roosevelt that led to the internment of 120,000 Japanese Americans during WWII.  www.allegiancemusical.com
 
Coming Soon:
·         Watertown Welcomes Immigrants Rally in Watertown Square, Sunday 26 February 2017, at 3 PM.
 
 
About WBCA-LP 102.9 FM Boston & Schmidt Happens:
WBCA is a low-power FM radio station sponsored by the Boston Neighborhood Network, and is on the air from 6 PM to 2 AM each night.
 
Radio Beantown is on the air! Jumana Hashim is a current member of Beantown Women’s Rugby Club, while Rosemary, aka Rosebud, Schmidt has been retired a few years.  
 
Beantown practice starts soon! Check out www.BeantownRugby.com for more details. No experience necessary; a place for everybody. All are welcome. Go Forward, Support!
 
Thank you again to guest host, Ellen Iorio, for helping out with the January show, bringing all her pithiness, and pointing us to the article in The Daily Beast that helped us complete the thread.
 

Song For The Day:
From Jason Mraz, “Details in the Fabric,” which just struck a chord w/ me, and ties into the whole theme of knit caps, threads getting pulled, everything coming undone, keeping it together while it seems things are unraveling before our very eyes. Listen to the very end, let us be an “island of reality” for each other in this “ocean of diarrhea.”
 

 
References
 
Abrahams, Yvonne. 2017. Our Chance to Write History. The Boston Globe. 5 February 2017.
 
 
Dennis, Brady. 2017. Acting EPA head: Hiring freeze challenges ‘our ability to get the agency’s work done.’ The Washington Post. 15 February 2017.
 

Fuentes, Jake. 2017. The Immigration Ban is a Headfake, And We’re Falling For It. A Medium Corporation. 30 January 2017.
 

Hess, Amanda. 2017. How a Fractious Women’s Movement Came to Lead the Left. The New York Times Magazine. 7 February 2017.
 

Linskey, Annie. 2017. Warring West Wing factions dismay management experts. The Boston Globe. 18 February 2017.
 
 
Radosh, Ronald. 2016. Steve Bannon, Trump’s Top Guy, Told Me He Was ‘A Leninist’ Who Wants to ‘Destroy the State.’ The Daily Beast. 22 August 2016.

Takei, George. 2017. How ‘America First’ puts many of us last. USA Today. 15 February 2017.
 
 

© 2017 Rosemary A. Schmidt
Rose Schmidt is the author of “Go Forward, Support! The Rugby of Life” (Gainline Press 2004). The views expressed herein are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the views of any other agency or organization. Use of individual quotes with proper citation and attribution, within the limits of fair use, is permitted. If you would like to request permission to use or reprint any of the content on the site, please contact me.
 
Radio Broadcast © 2017 Jumana Hashim, Rosemary Schmidt. For permission to re-print or re-broadcast the radio shows, please contact the radio hosts and/or WBCA-LP 102.9 FM Boston for permission. The views expressed in the radio broadcast are those of the hosts, and not any other agency, entity or organization. Every effort has been made to give proper credits and citations for material quoted/cited. Any errors or omissions are not intentional and every effort will be made to make corrections as soon as they are brought to our attention. 


Friday, February 17, 2017

The Post-March Post

Next radio show to air Saturday night 18 Feb 2017 at 6:50 PM Eastern
And again Sunday night 19 Feb 2017 at 8 PM
WBCA-LP 102.9 FM Boston

Alternative Theories: What Else Is Going On?
Hosted by Jumana Hashim and Rosemary Schmidt
Blog & audio link to accompany the show will be published after the show airs.

***************************************************************************************************

But first: A quick recap of the Jan 2017 show
Democracy: It’s All About Showing Up - And Being Pithy!

Audio Links:

SoundCloud
https://soundcloud.com/rosemary-schmidt-673577789/democracy-schmidthappens20170109-1855

Google Drive

 
 
 


 

 
When we started recounting our experience at Professor Michael Sandel’s talk on Democracy last fall, held at Faneuil Hall as part of HUBweek, we quickly discovered that we had walked away with very different takes on it. While I had a beef with both the questions and the audience not showing up, Ellen countered that the audience did in fact show up – just in the way that the liberal elite show up, prepared for a cerebral discussion, but lacking the juice. Even going back to the days of the revolution, it helped the colonists by having a pithy saying to rally around: “Taxation without representation is tyranny.” So, I quipped, all the Democrats need is a class in how to say things in 140 characters or less? A Twitterversity?
 
Where are the Democrats now? And the reasonable Republicans? We speculated that the Democrats are feeling beaten down, like they lost. This despite the fact that Hillary got about three million more votes. The Republicans meanwhile perhaps are cowering, in fear of losing their jobs. (We still don’t know to what extent Russia influenced the outcome.) Maybe it would appear heavy handed for the Democrats to say too much before the new administration took power.
 
Yet, it all seems so fragile, so tenuous. It feels like it could all be undone, with the pull of a thread.
 
There is a great quote, by George Takei, an LGBTQ activist, drawing on his experience when he was interred with his family and other Japanese-Americans during World War II, in which he shares some advice from his father:
 
“He told me that our democracy is a people’s democracy, and it can be as great as the people can be, but it is also as fallible as people are.”
 
What can we do? Be vigilant, and show up! And make our Democracy great again!
 
 
Post-March:
And show up we did:
175,000 strong in Boston
250,000 in Chicago
500,000 in D.C.
And hundreds of thousands more in towns across the world, from Anchorage to Zurich.
 
If the Democrats’ problem has been a lack of pithiness, and short, bright sound bites to rally around, there was no shortage of pithiness at the March. Each sign was a gem. Our cups runneth over now with pithiness.
 
What struck me is that I’m not sure any of this would have happened if Hillary would have won. It would have been more business as usual. Democrats would have been satisfied, but there wouldn’t have been people in the street.
 
Songs have been a huge part of the story as well, all of us going back and digging up protest songs from decades ago.
 
“Don’t it always seem to go
That you don’t know what you’ve got
‘Till it’s gone”
~ Joni Mitchell
 
“This Land Is Your Land” seemed to be everywhere, too, and was lauded as perhaps the most singable protest song of the weekend in an article by Amelia Mason for WBUR:
 
“Music abounded at the Boston Women’s March on Saturday, but if I had to pick a winner, it would be Woody Guthrie’s ‘This Land Is Your Land.’ I heard it blasted by a brass band as they paraded down Beacon, and sung lustily from a balcony on Charles. I heard it on the MBTA on the way to the march, rippling form the far end of the car down the ranks of protesters packed shoulder to shoulder, patiently awaiting their release onto the streets.”
 

All the more ironic, then, when Lady Gaga sang both “God Bless America,” followed by “This Land Is Your Land,” during the Super Bowl halftime show, from her perch high atop the stadium at NRG field in Houston.
 
 
Then there was the song by MILCK, “Quiet,” that absolutely triggers goose bumps every time I hear it, and was adopted as an anthem by some marchers: We can’t keep quiet.
 
 
Morning Joe on MSNBC also nailed it, totally rocked it that Monday morning after the inauguration and all the rallies, playing the classic song from 1966 by Buffalo Springfield, “For What It’s Worth (Stop, Hey What’s That Sound),” showing alternating pictures from both events. After the video, Joe Scarborough remarks:
 
“Two days in January, a Saturday and a Sunday, I think incredibly described in the most prescient manner by Buffalo Springfield fifty years ago.”
 
You can find the video on Joe Scarborough’s twitter feed on 23 January 2017, or view an unofficial version on YouTube:
 
This line rang so true:
“A thousand people in the street
Singing songs and carrying signs.”
 
I was so struck by the sea of pink kitty hats at all the rallies. Mostly hand-knit, which made me think of one of the last things we had said in the prior radio show: Everything feels so tenuous, like things could be undone, all with the pull of a thread. But, at least for one day, these pink hats literally, figuratively, and metaphorically knit us together.
 
And then the Executive Orders started rolling out and the unraveling began.
 
To be continued in the next radio show & blog!
 
 
About WBCA-LP 102.9 FM Boston:

WBCA is a low-power FM radio station sponsored by the Boston Neighborhood Network, and is on the air from 6 PM to 2 AM each night.
 
Radio Beantown is on the air! Jumana Hashim is a current member of Beantown Women’s Rugby Club, while Rosemary, aka Rosebud, Schmidt has been retired a few years.  
 
Thank you again to guest host, Ellen Iorio, for helping to guest host the January show, and bringing all her pithiness!
 
 
References
 
Andrews, Travis M. 2017. If You Thought Lady Gaga’s Halftime Show Was Apolitical, Consider the Origin of ‘This Land Is Your Land.’  Washington Post, 6 February 2017.
 
 
Hilton, Robin. 2017. A Flash Mob Choir At The Women’s March Turned This Unknown Song Into An Anthem. NPR.org. 23 January 2017.
 
 
Mason, Amelia. 2017. From Flash Mobs to Janelle Monae, Women’s Marches Join a New Wave of Protest Music. WBUR.org. 24 January 2017.
 
 
© 2017 Rosemary A. Schmidt
Rose Schmidt is the author of “Go Forward, Support! The Rugby of Life” (Gainline Press 2004). The views expressed herein are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the views of any other agency or organization. Use of individual quotes with proper citation and attribution, within the limits of fair use, is permitted. If you would like to request permission to use or reprint any of the content on the site, please contact me.
 
Radio Broadcast © 2017 Jumana Hashim, Rosemary Schmidt and Ellen Iorio. For permission to re-print or re-broadcast the radio shows, please contact the radio hosts and/or WBCA-LP 102.9 FM Boston for permission. The views expressed in the radio broadcast are those of the hosts, and not any other agency, entity or organization. Every effort has been made to give proper credits and citations for material quoted/cited. Any errors or omissions are not intentional and every effort will be made to make corrections as soon as they are brought to our attention.

Sunday, January 22, 2017

Democracy: It's All About Showing Up


The following is a recap of the radio show which was recorded on January 9, 2017, and first aired on January 21, 2017 on WBCA-LP 102.9 FM Boston.
 
Note, this is not intended to be a verbatim transcript, but a recap of the highlights, with some further ponderings, references, and links thrown in. In this case, the blog was written first, and the radio show was based off it, leading to the follow-on conversation about Democracy.

Please feel free to add your comments/ideas/suggestions for future shows/topics as a comment on this blog post.

Democracy: It’s All About Showing Up
 
Professor Michael Sandel at Faneuil Forum, HUBweek, September 26, 2016

Boston Women's March, January 21, 2017
 
 
Let’s flash back to Professor Michael Sandel’s philosophy class on Democracy, this past fall as part of HUBweek 2016, billed as the Faneuil Forum. As it would turn out, the night of the talk, September 26, 2016, was also the same night as the first Trump-Clinton presidential debate, so the discourse at Faneuil Hall wrapped up in time for attendees to go home and catch the debate as well.

We arrived, my friend and I, after catching a quick bite to eat in the North End, this time at The Daily Catch, ordering steamers, served in a buttery bath, and so we floated in, awash and aglow in a garlicky haze. Yes, we like the other attendees arrived, but did we show up? That is the question.

Professor Sandel tried to engage the audience in debate, baiting us with questions intended to challenge us and offer a response. Two problems: the questions and the audience. We knew the topic was going to be democracy, but we didn’t expect the questions offered, plus they seemed a bit contrived and difficult to apply to the real world. The audience, of course hyper well-educated, was too smart, too cagey to get pulled into a debate and then talked into a corner by some philosophical wits of charm, without having done further research into things first and developing a fully-formed opinion. No one wanted to speak off the cuff, and then be made to look like a first-class fool in front of the masses. While we were interested, we were not engaged, and were in no mood to stick our necks out on the line.

The first question posed was whether a vote-swapping system should be considered acceptable. Huh?  Hypothetically, let’s say a voter in Massachusetts who was for Hillary wanted to influence an election in a swing state, say New Hampshire, and through some mechanism online perhaps, could trade votes with someone in New Hampshire, who wanted to influence the election in Massachusetts.

Most of us were like, “Huh?” As we tried to picture how such a system would work, we had even more difficulty, struggling to imagine the motivations for both individuals to go through such machinations to swap votes. Why would the voter in New Hampshire want to give up their vote in their home swing state? It made no sense to me, and since it seemed so hypothetical and unrealistic, it never entered the realm of anything I would vigorously debate.

Eventually the point was made that such a system might be the start down the slippery slope of monetizing the vote. Everyone was pretty much in agreement that selling votes was not right and should not be allowed. At some point, by the end of this discussion, there was a passing mention of whether the electoral college should be done away with, which would make the whole vote-swapping scheme entirely irrelevant. I remember thinking to myself at the time, now that would be something worth discussing and debating, and something I could really get behind and support. One person, one vote. And, for that matter, I thought, why aren’t we talking about the roughly 40% of eligible voters who don’t show up to the polls at all?

If I had it to do all over again, I would rush the stage, and rip the microphone from his hand and beg the audience to debate these questions, and ask, why are we being so proper? Our founding fathers – and mothers – would be so disappointed in us. They fought so hard for the right to hold vigorous debate. Democracy is messy, requires hard work, and hearing all sides.

Looking back at my sparse notes (which might still smell a bit like garlic), I see written: “Marty Walsh: obligation.” Mayor Walsh thought that voting was an obligation. Moral obligation? Civic obligation? I don’t recall. Below that I see my own words: Precious, priceless.

The discussion moved on to other topics, questions about public lands, rights and freedoms, the ethics of parking space savers, fines vs. fees, and refugees.

Bottom line: The audience failed to show up.

And that’s what happened again in November.

The lesson should be that the first and most fundamental principle of democracy is showing up, participating and engaging in vigorous debate on the issues.

In some ways, a condo association resembles a democracy on a much scaled-down version. When everything is pretty much going alright, no one shows up to the meetings.

It is akin to what Azar Nafisi wrote of in her book The Republic of Imagination:

“This is what Tocqueville warned us against: a time when Americans would be prosperous and comfortable enough to withdraw from the public domain and satisfy themselves within their own private interests.”

The only time people show up en masse is when something is wrong, or when something is affecting individual owners personally, such as when it’s raining in one’s living room, and there’s an assessment levied to fix leaky roofs. While the decisions should be made fairly, and in the best interest of the entire community, it is easy for the discussion to be dominated by the loudest voice in the room.

There were some very loud voices in the room this election season. It is shocking to see the racism and hate-mongering that has been tapped into and unleashed by the Trump campaign. I see some photos online of Trump supporters celebrating, carrying signs that read “Make America White Again,” and “Stop Hate Crime Laws.” At first I thought the sign read “Stop Hate Crimes,” which would be a good thing, and then I realize that in fact they are against hate crime laws. Alt-right celebrants were displaying Nazi salutes at a restaurant in D.C. just doors down from the Holocaust Museum. These are troubled times indeed.

In some ways, it probably wouldn’t have mattered which candidate ran against the Democrats, the Republican candidate would have had the support of the alt-right. However, by not vocally criticizing or distancing himself from his alt-right supporters, Trump gave them power, license, legitimacy, and emboldened them.

As one young, very wise black woman pointed out, this is nothing new. It has always been there, this undercurrent of racism. The difference now is that they’re out of hiding and we know who they are. The hoods are off.

I think back on the many times I have walked or jogged the Battle Road trail in Concord, and have tried to fathom the depth of the Colonists’ anger. What would drive them to pick up muskets against their country? The phrase, “taxation without representation” doesn’t seem to do it justice; it seems just too abstract. I’ve often thought, what would it take, what would I stand up for, what would I consider worth fighting for? And now I know, it is this. Freedom to be, to love and marry. For all people to thrive, regardless of race or religion, to be treated with dignity and respect.

This, all of this, is what I would stand up for, and march.


Post March:
What an amazing, historic day. Epic.
This is what Democracy looks like.
We showed up.

Ironically, President Trump has succeeded spectacularly at uniting us in surprising and wonderful ways we never expected.

There were speeches and songs. America the Beautiful. Amazing Grace.

Mayor Marty Walsh delivered the most rousing speech, firing up the crowd, remarking on Massachusetts being the first on healthcare and same-sex marriage.

Senator Elizabeth Warren received the biggest welcome from the admiring crowd.
“First we fight for basic human dignity and respect for all. Second, economic opportunity for everyone.” Senator Ed Markey spoke, and was followed by several others, difficult to hear everything. Attorney General Maura Healey was one of the last speakers: “This is what love trumping hate looks like!”

While waiting for our turn to join the march, the small group around us sang some songs to pass the time: This Little Light of Mine, We Shall Overcome, Amazing Grace, This Land is Our land, and Bohemian Rhapsody. (We were running out of songs we knew the lyrics!)

Fortunate to get to march near the marching band, and get to sing along with “When the Saints Go Marching In.”
 

A few of the most interesting signs:
Girls just want to have fun-damental human rights
Our rights are not up for grabs
Pussy grabs back
Respect my existence or expect my resistance
I’m with her – and her – and her…
This is not a moment, it’s the start of a movement
 

Post Script
Thank you to everyone who marched Saturday January 21st, either in D.C. or in Boston, or any of the other sister marches. Thank you for showing up.

Thank you to guest host Ellen Iorio for bringing her unique wit and perspective to the radio show, and adding the pitch-perfect George Takei quote:

“Our democracy is a people’s democracy, and it can be as great as the people can be, but it is also as fallible as the people are.”

In case it was rendered unrecognizable, the opening chords at the start of the show were from “This land is Our Land.” There’s nothing like a good song to bring people together. Look what “Go Cubs Go” did for the Cubs this year!

One last look back at the 2016 World Series. Congrats to Terry Francona, who was voted Manager of the Year. He was, and still is, an upstanding guy. While I have joked a bit about the fried chicken in the clubhouse, if the rumors are true, then this really did show incredible disrespect for Tito, and for the game.  He tried to set a collegial tone and give his players a lot of leash, and this is what he got in return.

It’s not like this in rugby. Everyone shows up and is engaged. One of the plays that sticks in my memory came in a B-side game against our cross-town rivals, Boston Women, sometime in say 1995 or so. I had been working out of town the week prior, so I was even a bit surprised that I was selected to play. It seemed like every time we got the ball, something would happen and we would lose momentum. While it was just a B-side game, there is really no such thing as “just” a game in rugby ever. You’re either all in, or you’re all out. I remember starting to feel so frustrated. We’d had the ball, and then it got turned over and the Boston player was about to kick, and I remember thinking in my head, “No, not again,” and I went up and blocked the kick, all five-foot-two of me. It was at such close range, it bounced off me, and propelled me backward to the ground. We wound up with a scrum, instead of having the ball kicked deep into our own territory. A couple of the A-side players came out to check on how I was, since they had been following the game along the sidelines and cheering us on. Not off having fried chicken, if you get my point here. There was none of that; not until all the games were done for the day anyway. We were all in, and in it for each other.
 

About WBCA-LP 102.9 FM Boston:
WBCA-LP is a low-power FM radio station sponsored by the Boston Neighborhood Network, and is on the air from 6 PM to 2 AM each night.

Radio Beantown is on the air! Jumana Hashim is a current member of Beantown Women’s Rugby Club, while Rosemary, aka Rosebud, Schmidt has been retired a few years.  
 

References

Nafisi, Azar. 2014. The Republic of Imagination: A Life in Books. New York: Penguin Books.

March Pictures:

















 

© 2017 Rosemary A. Schmidt
Rose Schmidt is the author of “Go Forward, Support! The Rugby of Life” (Gainline Press 2004). The views expressed herein are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the views of any other agency or organization. Use of individual quotes with proper citation and attribution, within the limits of fair use, is permitted. If you would like to request permission to use or reprint any of the content on the site, please contact me.

 

Radio Broadcast © 2017 Jumana Hashim, Rosemary Schmidt and Ellen Iorio. For permission to re-print or re-broadcast the radio shows, please contact the radio hosts and/or WBCA-LP 102.9 FM Boston for permission. The views expressed in the radio broadcast are those of the hosts, and not any other agency, entity or organization. Every effort has been made to give proper credits and citations for material quoted/cited. Any errors or omissions are not intentional and every effort will be made to make corrections as soon as they are brought to our attention.